THE CADENCE OF THOUGHT

 

Dear Readers,
        This piece is in response to a request made by two avid readers of my articles. They expressed the hope that poetry also be included as one form of my written word. Frankly speaking, I am a little apprehensive of this idea. Not many people appreciate poetry. Even fewer read it. In my view, its readership can be divided into four distinct categories:
1.     A select group who are really fascinated with the cadence of thought - 1%.
2.     A few others who ‘think’ they like to appreciate the strokes of the word, since it makes them look more ‘intellectually inclined’  - 6%.
3.     The general public - the bhadralok to wit, who actually feel it is a painful process to go through, yet pretend to enjoy it, so that the sensitive soul who is the cause of it is not hurt - 80%.
4.     And finally, those that never tire of listening to or writing about the incessant outpourings from their hearts- the poets - 13%.
        I sincerely empathise with the unlucky last lot, because wherever they assemble, they always manage to be in a class by themselves- and I mean it literally. So, what is it about poetry that makes people want to vote with their feet?

    I did my own mental survey and came to the conclusion that, like all arts poetry is multidimensional. Anyone with an ear for simple language and plain rhythm can easily perceive its one-dimension approach. The two-dimensional factor can be felt by those who also care to listen to the pulse of the world. To get into the roots of the other dimensions requires a much broader spectrum of thought. Something like those finer nuances of classical arts of paintings, dance, cinema, theatre or music that often goes way above our unclassical heads.
      If anyone cared to examine the various forms and expressions of these arts, what once seemed tedious may soon turn into a pleasure. ‘Classy art’ is perceived to be something inscrutable-outside the pale of the common soul. And in poetry, it becomes all the more difficult because interpretation depends on the individual. If ten people read one poem, you get ten different interpretations. Over a period, this interpretation often dons the garb of ‘research’ and everything except the ‘essential meaning’ of the poet remains! Not all poems do, but many have gone through this process- of either being martyred or idolized, depending on the mood of the critical appreciator. I, for one, would not like my poems to be considered either too simple to be swallowed or too difficult to digest. No poem is simple- even a ‘London Bridge is falling down’ has a depth that springs forth multiple fountains of historical facts and wisdom. No poem is difficult either. Even the most tricky of them, becomes simple, if you have the patience and perseverance.  

             Perhaps, I too would have carried on with my riddling of words, often leaving behind an element of mysticism, had I not received a mail from one of my nephews. ‘Believe me auntie’ it said, with an earnestness I simply cannot forget, ‘it took me three readings to understand the depth of your writing. Please spare a thought for us lesser mortals too’. I then realized that it takes either guts, innocence or plain honesty to point out the “emperor’s new clothes”. And that is when I decided to remove my enigmatic mask and try to reach out to the public. Of what use is art if it is not broadly shared? 
           By this I do not in any way suggest that I am the only intelligent being on board this ship of foolish earthlings. On the contrary, what I mean with all humility is that, since poetry springs from the heart and only then branches off to its other tributaries, if the origin of the poem is explained, it would be so much easier to grasp. Thus, before my every poem, I would like to present a short preamble in prose. I would term this the spine of my poems. For a layman this might prove to be the strongest form of support to get a better picture of my creation. For the wiser, this could become a link to its heart and mind. For the wisest it can even lead to its soul.
           What follows next is my first experimentation with a melding of prose and poetry. I sincerely hope it is successful.
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

PREFACE

 

This poem was written in response to a mail sent by a dear friend of mine. It was after I received a letter from the President Mr. A.P.J.Kalam, appreciating my book ‘Daddy’. The friend was so genuinely delighted, that the happiness was conveyed with a simple but profound statement. ‘May I hug you?’ it said. I then started to wonder, what a hug was all about. I speculated on its different shades- the pure, the perverse and the platonic. And about all the types of hugs I had been subjected to in my life- as a child, a teenager, a woman, a sister, a friend and a mother. Thus, from the seeds of an innocuous but sincere utterance, this poem blossomed.   

 

A TOUCHING EXPERIENCE

What is a hug?

An all- embracing salutation

of profound feelings.

Spoken with the senses

it is

a pluralistic dialogue

between two thinking hearts.

When coupled with pleasure

it can be pleasing

when coupled with sorrow

it can be soothing

when coupled with desire

it can be demanding

when coupled with lust

it can be loathing

when coupled with a welcome

it can be bonding

and

when coupled with a farewell

it can tear you apart!

What is a hug?

A simplistic secret

of sweet sentiments

spoken and valued

by two sensitive souls.

Nargis.